http://killingkillers.blogspot.com/2012_12_01_archive.html
I quote:
"The obsessive video-gamer showed up at the school just as morning classes were commencing dressed as a character from Call of Duty, a single-shooter game that features that same rifle.
Games like Call of Duty are developed and used by the U.S. military as well as many other armed forces for conditioning soldiers to kill.
Investigators report that baby killer Adam Lanza played these kind of violent videogames "for hours everyday" in a windowless basement of his home, to the apparent exclusion of any other activity."
Notice how he paints Lanza as An Obsessive video gamer and refuses to even mention mental illness once in this quote. NOT ONCE. He then goes out to try to prove that Adam Lanza played Call of duty even though it came from a tabloid with no proof. There is no single proven bit of evidence that comes from any source that tries to prove he played C.O.D. that doesn't quote this tabloid, whatsoever. I have never found it. He then tries to say that Investigators claimed that the "baby Killer" lanza "Adam Lanza played these kind of violent videogames "for hours everyday" in a windowless basement of his home, to the apparent exclusion of any other activity."
Where did he get this BS from? He pulled it out from his ass, because this basement claim (which is BS) came from an article which A) Claimed the same thing and B) Quoted the Tabloid article that made up the claim in the first place, that I mentioned above.
Number 2 : "Games like Call of Duty are developed and used by the U.S. military as well as many other armed forces for conditioning soldiers to kill."
This is complete bullshit.
The military has only made 1 series of games out of over 600, America's Army. Most are made by gaming studios like Epic, ID, Valve, etc, not Military contractors!! This link disproves the claim he makes that games like this are used by the Armed forces to break down the inhibition to kill. It's a blog, not written by another "Gamer babykiller", but by a US Marine Corps Soldier who served time in IRAQ. I quote:
"Let me give you some background. I am coming out of a four-year stint in the United States Marine Corps. I spent six months in Afghanistan and two months in Iraq (crossing the Line of Departure a mere 72 hours after the word was given by the President).
While not in a combat unit, every Marine's primary job is basic rifleman. We are all considered trained enough to put steel on target when the lawful order is given.
Video games are poor training tools. For anything, really. I think the last games I learned from were Sticky Bear Math and Number Munchers.
I'm not aware of any military unit that uses video games to break down the inhibition to kill.
In fact, this breakdown really only occurs in one place: Boot camp.
Boot camp doesn't even specifically concentrate on the inhibition to kill. Rather, they follow the CIA training manual for brainwashing almost point by point, in order to instill in recruits 'instant and willing obedience to lawful orders' - that is what they do. The assumption, of course, is that these orders may be to kill; But they could be to drag a wounded child to safety, or set up a bunker in 100 degree weather, or pull night watch after being up for a 36-hour convoy.
The inhibition to kill can only be broken down by, wait for it . . . killing.
When we were parked on the outskirts of Fallujah and watched as night fell and the Iraqis came out onto the streets, even though our orders were much more liberal than the current Rules of Engagement, there was still hesitation. And this after our convoy had turned around after taking fire at the front."
Now to ruthlessly BS Filter the rest of the BS this moron types:
"With this year's announcement by U.S. military officials that they plan on redesigning their simulated killer programs to now include "female suicide bombers" in them, and the billion-dollar gaming industry's morbid penchant for imitation, public attention is also shifting to the role such popular sims play in the recent spate of massacres against unarmed civilians.
Those who've studied the negative impact graphicly violent games have on habitual players fear that adding female shooting targets in them will greatly increase the likelihood of more mass gunman targeting women and children. Perhaps even in teams, since these unstable types tend to copycat and are always competing for top scores.
This upcoming Friday has been designated as an international day of mourning and memorium for the Sandy Hook victims. In a self-conscious move this week, major spokesmen for the Gaming community have publicly appealed for a virtual ceasefire in honor of that day.
Researchers note that besides dangerously elevating aggression in participants, these violent videogames are also psychologically addicting, so it's not known if any gamers will be able to abide by their leaders' request, even if they wanted to."
Number 1, the whole "Scores" thing is BS.... There is a claiming going around that the perpetrators of School shootings, particularly Columbine and Sandy hook killed kids to get a higher score. But here's the thing. Very Few "Violent" FPS games EVEN HAVE SCORES IN THEM AT ALL. Since doom, the whole concept of "Score" has been rarely used at all, because it takes away from the survival aspect of FPS games... Since then only, the later COD games and Serious Sam have even had Score as a Stat in the games. But even if that weren't true, the BS claim that the psychotic killers Lanza/Harris/Klebold/etc weren't killing kids for the "highest" score. In every school shooting, there is always another reason, most of the time swept under the rug or covered up by the FBI.
In columbine's case, no one knew the REAL reason till 2012! A freedom of information act revealed that the FBI had been withholding evidence that Harris was raped by the Colorado Sherriffs in an 1998 arrest for bomb making materials, and whole massacre was a botched terrorist attack planned to kill as many kids as possible to get the police to storm the place so they could kill as many cops as they could befoere going out in a suicidal blaze..... Absolutely nowhere in harris's writings does he say, directly, or indirectly "Doom is great. Let's go out and kill kids in CHS to make it more real." or something like that. All the evidence the media keeps on bringing out is merely based on internet hoaxes proven by me to be hoaxes in these articles. Article 1 written by me, mentions the "Doom will become reality on april 20'th" hoax virally spread after the Shooting by the media and how it's based on a Fake Eric Harris Site. There was also a claim that Harris modified Doom to make it into a "School shooting sim" which is BS because the articles spreading this claim claim he was able to do things Doom could have not done in 1999, such as infinite weapons, Friendly AI, etc... I debunked that in article 2.
In columbine's case, no one knew the REAL reason till 2012! A freedom of information act revealed that the FBI had been withholding evidence that Harris was raped by the Colorado Sherriffs in an 1998 arrest for bomb making materials, and whole massacre was a botched terrorist attack planned to kill as many kids as possible to get the police to storm the place so they could kill as many cops as they could befoere going out in a suicidal blaze..... Absolutely nowhere in harris's writings does he say, directly, or indirectly "Doom is great. Let's go out and kill kids in CHS to make it more real." or something like that. All the evidence the media keeps on bringing out is merely based on internet hoaxes proven by me to be hoaxes in these articles. Article 1 written by me, mentions the "Doom will become reality on april 20'th" hoax virally spread after the Shooting by the media and how it's based on a Fake Eric Harris Site. There was also a claim that Harris modified Doom to make it into a "School shooting sim" which is BS because the articles spreading this claim claim he was able to do things Doom could have not done in 1999, such as infinite weapons, Friendly AI, etc... I debunked that in article 2.
The other thing is the BS claim that Women in violent games will lead to more "baby-killing" gamers killing women and children. This is complete BS, and is backed up by NOT 1 SINGLE FACT.... Number 1, the only "Baby killing Gamer" in History, is.... DRUMROLL... ADAM LANZA. THATS IT. No other gamer has killed young children. There are millions of gamers world wide, only 1 has killed little children.
The whole claim that little children will get killed by "baby killing gamers" is just bs to start a moral panic that involves locking up gamers or "treating them" (no doubt by military disciple/electroshock therapy/harassment/sexual abuse) which is being recommended already to "violent" and "nonviolent" mental illness victims, like people with aspbergers. Already BS is being spread about how violent games cause mental illnesses, and if Military discipline and Army boot camp like treatment are being recommended for Aspbergers, then it's wise to assume it will be used to "treat" the "baby killing" gamers that haven't committed a crime in their life, nevermind killed a kid. The real issue is that this is being possibly recommended to stop a tiny, less than 1% percentage of gamers from killing babies.
Another thing. Adam Lanza didn't even kill babies. Babies = less than 2 years old. He killed pre-schoolers. NONE OF THEM WERE BABIES. They were toddlers. This is scapegoating to make us all look like "baby killers" nothing more. Here is the % of gamers who have killed toddlers. 0.3%. % of Gamers who have Killed babies = 0.001%, based on all the cases I've read. The sandy hook shooting doesn't count. No babies were killed in that.
The whole claim that little children will get killed by "baby killing gamers" is just bs to start a moral panic that involves locking up gamers or "treating them" (no doubt by military disciple/electroshock therapy/harassment/sexual abuse) which is being recommended already to "violent" and "nonviolent" mental illness victims, like people with aspbergers. Already BS is being spread about how violent games cause mental illnesses, and if Military discipline and Army boot camp like treatment are being recommended for Aspbergers, then it's wise to assume it will be used to "treat" the "baby killing" gamers that haven't committed a crime in their life, nevermind killed a kid. The real issue is that this is being possibly recommended to stop a tiny, less than 1% percentage of gamers from killing babies.
Another thing. Adam Lanza didn't even kill babies. Babies = less than 2 years old. He killed pre-schoolers. NONE OF THEM WERE BABIES. They were toddlers. This is scapegoating to make us all look like "baby killers" nothing more. Here is the % of gamers who have killed toddlers. 0.3%. % of Gamers who have Killed babies = 0.001%, based on all the cases I've read. The sandy hook shooting doesn't count. No babies were killed in that.
More bullshit from the article:
"In addition, Obama has publicly
vowed to open a "meaningful" dialog now about guns and violence,
particularly as it pertains to the rising crime wave among the young and
these now-commonplace mass assaults.
And for the claim that "many other mass killers" played violent games, this is BS too. Only one other did, and he was an Anti-Islam Extremist Hate mongerer from Norway. Which do you think triggered his rampage, Hate mongering, or playing World of Warcraft... HMMM, There are no others!!!! Even if there were it would be less than 10% of the millions of gamers who are killers.. That means 90-95% ARE NOT KILLERS and this claim therefore is BULLSHIT.
This is the problem I've been keeping on talking about, Ad Nauseum. There is too much stereotyping of Gamers as killers, School Shooters, etc. But this is much worse then that... This takes it to a new level. We're now Baby Killers. That's right.... Fucking "Baby" Killers. Even Though Adam Lanza didn't even kill one baby. Just a bunch of pre-schoolers. What have we done to deserve this title? 99% of the gaming population has done NOTHING to deserve this. This moron writes his own books and keeps on stereotyping us as the problem. We're not.
Discussing discussions is a good
start, of course, but advocates for gun control will be the first to say
that it's also a long overdue move, with too many dead having piled up
during an inordinate and unjustified delay.
What's more, if these proposed talks
fail to address the role of violent videogames in this surge
of violence, and if the billion-dollar gaming industry itself is not
also forced to come to the table, this will all be for naught.
Remember, Klebold and Harris, Jared
Loughner, James Holmes, Adam Lanza...all these young mass murderers and
many, many more just like them were violent video-gamers. All of these
dangerous psychopaths methodically trained as expert marksmen via
simulated single-shooter programs and a "harmless" little joystick."
Number 1, Klebold and Harris = Psychotic Terrorists. made psychotic by POLICE RAPE covered up by the FBI and the government and BS spread about Doom influencing them was the only proof found. This BS was put on fake websites and other places and has been debunked...
Jared Loughner = A psycho. NO MENTION of violent games mentioned on the Wikipedia page mentioning him...
James Holms = Militant Terrorist type. Played Fucking Guitar Hero. A guitar game. NONVIOLENT.
Adam Lanza = Psycho who killed young children.
And for the claim that "many other mass killers" played violent games, this is BS too. Only one other did, and he was an Anti-Islam Extremist Hate mongerer from Norway. Which do you think triggered his rampage, Hate mongering, or playing World of Warcraft... HMMM, There are no others!!!! Even if there were it would be less than 10% of the millions of gamers who are killers.. That means 90-95% ARE NOT KILLERS and this claim therefore is BULLSHIT.
This is the problem I've been keeping on talking about, Ad Nauseum. There is too much stereotyping of Gamers as killers, School Shooters, etc. But this is much worse then that... This takes it to a new level. We're now Baby Killers. That's right.... Fucking "Baby" Killers. Even Though Adam Lanza didn't even kill one baby. Just a bunch of pre-schoolers. What have we done to deserve this title? 99% of the gaming population has done NOTHING to deserve this. This moron writes his own books and keeps on stereotyping us as the problem. We're not.
