Well thanks to all those complete morons whining about video game violence after Las Vegas on twitter, we have Politicians and complete morons like Wayne Lapoopiere bashing video game violence. I thought the moral panic was over, but we now have idiots making up Bullshit claims about video game violence...
In a debate about gun control, Rick Santorum (A complete moron - why the hell did they invite morons like him to a debate is beyond me!) tried to say that "Multiple studies showed that video game violence influenced real-life violence"... Again another fucking moron saying complete BS after a shooting to try to pin it on violent games.... Let me Repeat. NO Study has linked video game violence to real life violence, only Aggression, which is not the same thing as violence. Let me repeat that: Aggression =/= Violence! Two different things you fucktard! What he said is a complete lie. The studies proved aggression, but stupid idiots like the Hack psychologist and Now Rick Santorum are now trying to say they prove that kids get violent after playing violent games. They don't prove that at all you fucking moron!
But that is only the tip of the iceberg people.. Wayne lapoopiere is back to try to mask his organization's (The NRA) responsibility in this shooting... They probably sold the guns to the Las Vegas Shooter, so they now whine about how the Who Entertainment industry and the Obama Admin are responcible for the shooting.
Here is some ACTUAL FACT based EVIDENCE I will use to debunk Turds Like Lapoopiere and Santorpuke... Do a search for "Stephen paddock" + "video games", and you get NO SITES linking him to violent games, only politicians whining against something that had nothing to do with the shooting (Violent games) in this case. Lapoopiere and Santorpuke ignore this fact that video games do not have anything to do with the shooting.. The shooter, Steven Paddock was in his 60's for fuck sake! WAY TOO OLD TO BE A GAMER! No one in their 60's plays violent games, they are far too old.... That's nonsense to say they do...
It's stupid. Now the politicans are whining about violent games after a shooting... AGAIN! A shooting that had nothing to do with Games....
Monday, October 9, 2017
Complete Morons on Twitter TRY to Blame Las Vegas Shooting on Vioolent Games!
Ok,
I'm posting this here, as well as my Censorship Related Blog, because I
want to show off idiocy on twitter that happened after the Las
Vegas Shooting incident that happened recently. As you are well aware
by now, Some crazy gunman shot and killed 60+ people at a Country Music
concert in Las
Vegas yesterday. I have no clue why he did it, but one thing I know is
that it wasn't the usual scapegoat of "OH NOES! VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES ARE
MAKING SHOOTERS KILL PEOPLE!"
How do I know this?
All you have to do is read people... Read the articles about the Perpetrator in this case such as This one, this one and This one.. Here's the ticker... None of them even say he played violent video games! NONE! So why in the blue hell are there idiots out there trying to incite BS by blaming a tragedy on Video Games?
On twitter, every time there is a mass shooting, I am all over it. I'm looking for:
A) People blaming the shooting on games or a gamer.. Both have happened in Mass Shootings
B) People using Fake Evidence to say the shooter was a Gamer. I've seen this as well..
I was looking on twitter when the mass shooting happened... And still am as of today. At first it was only 2-3 people blaming games but that count rose to 15-20 by tonight... It's spiraling out of control now. It's not nearly as bad as the UCC shooting, when there was 100+ people on twitter whining about violent games but you see what happens when violent games become a scapegoat.
As an author of an upcoming FPS game I just want to expose these idiots... So from now on this post will do just that..
I screencapped the idiots in question.. All 9 of them...
Another idiot blaming a shooting which has NOTHING to do with Games on Games.. No we don't need to "look at Video games full of bang-bang shoot-shoot!" you idiot. They had nothing to do with this... In fact we don't know why the guy did it, so stop trying to use a tragedy as an anti-gaming soapbox! BTW this guy calls himself an Entropenour... What an idiot.
No video games are not EVIL! Fuck you idiot. No proof was given on the
internet to prove he was a gamer, he was a gambling addict you idiot.
Nothing could be further from the truth. How is a video of innocent people being shot and killed like a video game where that crap does not happen, like Doom or what not. Over generalizing to bash a game again. Most games are NOT like the video in question, so this guy should just shut the fuck up.
No we are not Desensitized. Prove it! Stop lying between your teeth to spread PROVEN nonsense claims about fake video game violence causing Desensitization to real life Violence which cannot happen in real life anyway...
No I don't you idiot. The guy was obsessed with GAMBLING, not gaming. No hint of him being a gamer so stop spreading lies!
Prove
to me the shooter was a gamer you idiot. Who cares if "LIBERALS" who
"CONTROL media" are OK with this stupid over generalization of Violent
games. Most violent games have you fight Hostile enemies, not innocent
civilians to murder. Murdering demons and Soldiers and Aliens and
Zombies, none of that is possible because they all fight back. For it to
be murder, they have to be not attacking first, and guess what most
games don't have you fight defenseless civilians you idiot.
So What? It's not like we celebrate REAL violence. Hell most of the people who play video games don't play them for the violence, just the challenge or the immersion or whatever. People who play games for the violence are psychopaths and most gamers don't fall into this category. So this is nonsense because of that you turd.
More anti violent games BS which is said without proof AGAIN. Another idiot spreading a media lie without remorse. There is NO PROOF people who play violent games will act out the violence in real life, but does this idiot care? NO!
FUCK OFF! We don't need to censor violent games and TV due to a massacre that had no links to either. Stop being an idiot by pushing for censorship, because that's what NORMAL people call shitting on a tragedy to PUSH AN AGENDA!
These people piss me off.. I know there isn't a lot this time people, but there is a significant amount and it gets worse every day. It seems that there is always people trying to blame violent games for a massacre, NO MATTER what the cause might be. Even if the cause can be proven not to be violent game related, they don't care, they just do it. These people are inciting censorship of an artform and they need to go to jail for this. What if Senators or Congressman read these people or (God Forbid) they write to them and complain about violent games. Then we have actual censorship of something happening. Twitter needs to really step up their game by deleting accounts like this to prevent stupid unwanted censorship of an ART FORM after a shooting that had no links to the art form, AT ALL!
How do I know this?
All you have to do is read people... Read the articles about the Perpetrator in this case such as This one, this one and This one.. Here's the ticker... None of them even say he played violent video games! NONE! So why in the blue hell are there idiots out there trying to incite BS by blaming a tragedy on Video Games?
On twitter, every time there is a mass shooting, I am all over it. I'm looking for:
A) People blaming the shooting on games or a gamer.. Both have happened in Mass Shootings
B) People using Fake Evidence to say the shooter was a Gamer. I've seen this as well..
I was looking on twitter when the mass shooting happened... And still am as of today. At first it was only 2-3 people blaming games but that count rose to 15-20 by tonight... It's spiraling out of control now. It's not nearly as bad as the UCC shooting, when there was 100+ people on twitter whining about violent games but you see what happens when violent games become a scapegoat.
As an author of an upcoming FPS game I just want to expose these idiots... So from now on this post will do just that..
I screencapped the idiots in question.. All 9 of them...
Another idiot blaming a shooting which has NOTHING to do with Games on Games.. No we don't need to "look at Video games full of bang-bang shoot-shoot!" you idiot. They had nothing to do with this... In fact we don't know why the guy did it, so stop trying to use a tragedy as an anti-gaming soapbox! BTW this guy calls himself an Entropenour... What an idiot.
Nothing could be further from the truth. How is a video of innocent people being shot and killed like a video game where that crap does not happen, like Doom or what not. Over generalizing to bash a game again. Most games are NOT like the video in question, so this guy should just shut the fuck up.
No we are not Desensitized. Prove it! Stop lying between your teeth to spread PROVEN nonsense claims about fake video game violence causing Desensitization to real life Violence which cannot happen in real life anyway...
No I don't you idiot. The guy was obsessed with GAMBLING, not gaming. No hint of him being a gamer so stop spreading lies!
So What? It's not like we celebrate REAL violence. Hell most of the people who play video games don't play them for the violence, just the challenge or the immersion or whatever. People who play games for the violence are psychopaths and most gamers don't fall into this category. So this is nonsense because of that you turd.
More anti violent games BS which is said without proof AGAIN. Another idiot spreading a media lie without remorse. There is NO PROOF people who play violent games will act out the violence in real life, but does this idiot care? NO!
FUCK OFF! We don't need to censor violent games and TV due to a massacre that had no links to either. Stop being an idiot by pushing for censorship, because that's what NORMAL people call shitting on a tragedy to PUSH AN AGENDA!
These people piss me off.. I know there isn't a lot this time people, but there is a significant amount and it gets worse every day. It seems that there is always people trying to blame violent games for a massacre, NO MATTER what the cause might be. Even if the cause can be proven not to be violent game related, they don't care, they just do it. These people are inciting censorship of an artform and they need to go to jail for this. What if Senators or Congressman read these people or (God Forbid) they write to them and complain about violent games. Then we have actual censorship of something happening. Twitter needs to really step up their game by deleting accounts like this to prevent stupid unwanted censorship of an ART FORM after a shooting that had no links to the art form, AT ALL!
Wednesday, June 22, 2016
Stupid Loser on Twitter Tries to HIJACK #NoBillNoBreak to attack violent games
Ok...
Today the Senators decided to "hold Republicans Hostage" for a 21 hour
Filibuster to try to get Gun Control Legislation Passed.. They set up a Hashtag on twitter for this : #NoBillNoBreak
Now why am I mentioning this?
Some idiots are using these stupid hashtags to feed FALSE INFO to the senators now. FALSE INFO that bashes violent games. Like this tweet:
The tweet in question links to the following extremely flawed study...
The Study Attempts to use Heart Rate and GSR to "prove" violent games make people "desensitized" to "Real Life" Violence. That's complete Bunk. Number 1, video games can make people "desensitized" to video game violence, but since fake violence in a video game is not the same as "real" violence there is no way a game can desensitize a person to "real life" violence because they are different.
But the real problem with this study is it's trying to use measurements from areas OUTSIDE the brain to prove "desensitization" to real life violence. Your reaction to a real life violence can't be measured that way at all. It's complete nonsense. Since "desensitization" is a brain thing, measuring those two things makes no sense... Seeing Real life violence doesn't shock people enough to raise their heart rate or GSR. And even if that was true, there are other factors that can cause those two things to happen, so seeing those two results doesn't really prove violent games "desensitize" people to real life violence. It's a hack, a completely crazy one too.
But what really pisses me off is idiots like "My Atlanta Tweeps" trying to HIJACK a gun control debate to legislate their version of morality where violent games get banned or censored. It's sick. Violent games don't cause real life violence, that's BS I have debunked tons of times before. There are even studies proving this now. I am not making this up. There is even a study that disproves the whole idea that video games desensitize people to real life violence as well. You can read it here.
People like this idiot shouldn't be allowed internet access. They try to HIJACK a gun control debate to go after entertainment. They are brainwashed idiots who blindly believe "video games cause real life violence" because they don't know how to question all the fake BS people like the Hack Psychologists on talk shows have spread since Columbine.
EDIT: And we have another loser doing the same thing on twitter, this time wanting all gun violence to be removed from all entertainment that has it (TV, Movies, Video Games)
Now why am I mentioning this?
Some idiots are using these stupid hashtags to feed FALSE INFO to the senators now. FALSE INFO that bashes violent games. Like this tweet:
The tweet in question links to the following extremely flawed study...
The Study Attempts to use Heart Rate and GSR to "prove" violent games make people "desensitized" to "Real Life" Violence. That's complete Bunk. Number 1, video games can make people "desensitized" to video game violence, but since fake violence in a video game is not the same as "real" violence there is no way a game can desensitize a person to "real life" violence because they are different.
But the real problem with this study is it's trying to use measurements from areas OUTSIDE the brain to prove "desensitization" to real life violence. Your reaction to a real life violence can't be measured that way at all. It's complete nonsense. Since "desensitization" is a brain thing, measuring those two things makes no sense... Seeing Real life violence doesn't shock people enough to raise their heart rate or GSR. And even if that was true, there are other factors that can cause those two things to happen, so seeing those two results doesn't really prove violent games "desensitize" people to real life violence. It's a hack, a completely crazy one too.
But what really pisses me off is idiots like "My Atlanta Tweeps" trying to HIJACK a gun control debate to legislate their version of morality where violent games get banned or censored. It's sick. Violent games don't cause real life violence, that's BS I have debunked tons of times before. There are even studies proving this now. I am not making this up. There is even a study that disproves the whole idea that video games desensitize people to real life violence as well. You can read it here.
People like this idiot shouldn't be allowed internet access. They try to HIJACK a gun control debate to go after entertainment. They are brainwashed idiots who blindly believe "video games cause real life violence" because they don't know how to question all the fake BS people like the Hack Psychologists on talk shows have spread since Columbine.
EDIT: And we have another loser doing the same thing on twitter, this time wanting all gun violence to be removed from all entertainment that has it (TV, Movies, Video Games)
Monday, June 20, 2016
Republican Senators are trying to Legislate Video Games after Orlando in their Gun Proposal.
This allows them to study whether "Alleged" and "otherwise" mass
murderers played or discussed violent games and whether they trained on
them. Since training on games is impossible (see below), this will
attack violent games for a BS claim which isn't true (The Military
trains on them - brought up by the hack psychologists in the 90's on
talk shows)
It also targets NON Mass Murderers. They will be studying "Alleged" and "otherwise" mass murderers. Anyone can say someone "allegedly" killed people. Hell Adam Lanza's Brother and Youtube Comedian Samuel Hyde count for that because people blamed mass killings on them. The study will study people like this. Since these people never killed, the "alleged" mass murderer clause can be used to study anyone, because they can allegedly say someone killed people based on a rumor and claim they killed... I don't want the senate or the attorney general studying video game violence, especially committed by people who never killed anyone! That's stupid... So I suggest you write to your senators to stop this BS. I need you to. No one else is trying to stop it. Gamepolitics is gone. ESA doesn't care. #Gamergate doesn't give a shit (all they care about is sexism, not video game legislation!). I need you to fight this if you value your damn video games.
IT'S IMPORTANT..
"Hello.
It also targets NON Mass Murderers. They will be studying "Alleged" and "otherwise" mass murderers. Anyone can say someone "allegedly" killed people. Hell Adam Lanza's Brother and Youtube Comedian Samuel Hyde count for that because people blamed mass killings on them. The study will study people like this. Since these people never killed, the "alleged" mass murderer clause can be used to study anyone, because they can allegedly say someone killed people based on a rumor and claim they killed... I don't want the senate or the attorney general studying video game violence, especially committed by people who never killed anyone! That's stupid... So I suggest you write to your senators to stop this BS. I need you to. No one else is trying to stop it. Gamepolitics is gone. ESA doesn't care. #Gamergate doesn't give a shit (all they care about is sexism, not video game legislation!). I need you to fight this if you value your damn video games.
IT'S IMPORTANT..
EDIT : It seems the bill has died in congress.. Thanks Gamers. Nice Work!
"Hello.
I am writing you with a concern about Chuck Grassley's Senate Ammendmant
(SA 4751)
I looked at the text of it and it includes a clause to make the Attorney
General Study Video Game Violence, including whether a "alleged" mass
killer (or deceased one, or convicted one) discussed, played, or "trained"
on violent video games. I feel that doing this underhanded action in a gun control centered
piece of legislation unfairly blames the gaming industry for mass killings.
We've been through this time and time again over the years. In the 1990's we were blamed for columbine. Since then, every mass
shooting was blamed on violent games. Studies were done that were
very flawed and seemed to prove violent games cause aggression. Anti
Video game activists claimed that this proved they caused violence,
not aggression. Later on better studies were done that proved violent
games do not cause real life violence. By Studying video game violence, Grassley hopes to deflect the
blame away from guns and terrorism in general and onto violent
video games. The "Discussion of Violent Games" by "alleged" mass
killers allows him to target non-violent people and worse. He also
wants to find out if games can be used as training tools. The
short answer is NO. Many people have gone on TV shows saying that they can,
but they are all charletons interested in making money
(by suing Video Game Companies or Selling a book that says the
military uses games to train soldiers) The Following Site however is
written by someone in the military and completely debunks the claim.
I trust it because it's from the military and not from someone
trying to sell a book.... http://designsynthesis.blogspot.com/2005/03/training-our-kids-to-kill.html Games are not realistic enough to train to kill with.
The Ones Adam Lanza and Klebold/Harris played with certainly
aren't. Call of Duty and Doom are as far away from a realistic
game (defined as one that mimics real life at least close
to perfectly) as you can get. The guns aren't realistic. They
don't fire like real guns, you can't even learn how to properly
load them with a game like this.
Doom Especially. Call of duty is a little better but
it's far from a Realistic
combat simulator. And all the other games that the other
mass killers played
that are violent are sword fighting games, and since they killed with
guns, they don't count. Please do note vote for SA 4751. The Gaming
Industry does not need to be punished in a witch hunt over mass
shootings (especially Orlando) Caused by Terrorism."
If you don't fight this, who knows how many senators
will even see these issues,
nevermind fight them.
If it passes they're could be Gaming Legislation next.
That's disgusting, after a
shooting caused by terrorism... Shit like this needs
to be stopped. FIGHT IT.
"Can We Talk About Video Game Violence" filled with Anti-Gaming BS and Ad-Hominem Throwing Assfucks
The Article I mentioned yesterday "Can We talk about video game violence"
has gotten worse. The Article tried to blame video games for orlando.
It also blamed Call of Duty for Sandy Hook and Columbine (Even though
Columbine happened long before Call of Duty came out), and tries to say
other stupid shit like Loner types will get violent after playing games
and worse.
How it's gotten worse is this. A lot of commenters yesterday attacked it bad, but now you are getting tons of supporters attacking them and agreeing with the article.. Like this idiot:
"Just sad to me the amount of opposition to this article. Everything that we do in life has *some* impact on us. Spending hours at a time, over and over again hunting and killing fellow humans in virtual reality will have some effect. The military does not use games and simulators because they are simply *fun*. They use them to acclimate soldiers to violence, to train them to be better shots, etc. We can't reasonbly think that we can raise a generation of millions on killing and shooting and think that the net difference will be 0. As someone who formerly did a lot of gaming, it's just often sad to me that we think we're getting away with nothing."
Once again a complete idiot who tries to say games are used in the military to break down the inhibition to kill, which is a complete BS claim made up by the hack psychologists and debunked by a person in the military, on this blog.
I posted in the article twice. The first time I basically said that Millions of people played Doom and Call of Duty, yet only 3 killed. Then someone posts this crap in return.... the person in question was posting a lot of BS trying to say video games make people violent.
"Doom is probably the most gory of any videogame produced at the time. Shooting people and watching blood spray out is a murder-fetishist's wet dream."
This idiot spews crap about doom which is not true, surprise! And then tries to say violent video games are a "murder-fetishists wet dream". Number 1, the only fucking people in Doom are zombie soldiers. I can think of Tons of games from "that time" (1999) that are WAY more violent than doom.
Postal - Innocent people killing simulator
Shadow Warrior - Gorey as hell
Blood - Same Thing
Quake 2 - Same Thing
Heretic - Really Gorey
Quake - Same Thing
Duke3d - Gorey as hell
Surprise! that makes Doom NOT the most violent game from that time. Even Wolf3D's gore is worse.
And the murder fetishist wet dream sounds like something #fullmcintosh would say. His Comments spew nonsense spread by the Hack Psychologists too. I don't know if he is likening Gamers to Murder Fetishists, but if he is, he is an idiot. Gamers =/= murder fetishists! Fuck that stupid stereotypical crap.
There are other stupid comments on the article now. One tries to say "WAAAAAAH! these games are too violent, they shouldn't be allowed!", and I bet there will be worse
My Other comment basically exposed the article for using multiple sites to spam it on the Internet for moral panic creation purposes. That comment got deleted. I posted the images I will show you below in the comment and it got deleted. Every day more sites and twitter accounts/bots post the article over and over again... It's getting tons of coverage and this may lead to a moral panic now...
Here are images proving that it's been recycled on different sites and spread by TONS of twitter accounts...
Now I don't know why the fuck these people on winbeta want to censor me just like the idiots hosting the site the posted the shitty articles after The UCC Shooting, They Censor any post that tries to expose their agenda. It's stupid. I personally think that GG should go after this article now. I really don't want to post on it again. It will only lead to more BS Responses now, something I know from experience. I tell the truth and these fucking liars like BSheets and Waethorn spread complete BS to "debunk" things I say which are true. And the further it goes, the more likely they will ingage in ad-hominem threats and such, so I think It's time these people get targeted by other idiots online who are at least Pro-Gaming.
But the author of this article I want to call out now.
Kip, you are a fucking idiot. You're article is filled with lies and BS. You spread it on MULTIPLE SITES and MULTIPLE Twitter Accounts and BOTS to SPREAD a MORAL PANIC to satisfy your WET DREAM of video game CENSORSHIP after a TERRORIST ATTACK that had NOTHING to do with games. The shooter even called 911 to say "I DID IT FOR ISIS!" in the middle of the shooting. You are STOMPING on the VICTIMS for your own AGENDA. You are a fucktard.
How it's gotten worse is this. A lot of commenters yesterday attacked it bad, but now you are getting tons of supporters attacking them and agreeing with the article.. Like this idiot:
"Just sad to me the amount of opposition to this article. Everything that we do in life has *some* impact on us. Spending hours at a time, over and over again hunting and killing fellow humans in virtual reality will have some effect. The military does not use games and simulators because they are simply *fun*. They use them to acclimate soldiers to violence, to train them to be better shots, etc. We can't reasonbly think that we can raise a generation of millions on killing and shooting and think that the net difference will be 0. As someone who formerly did a lot of gaming, it's just often sad to me that we think we're getting away with nothing."
Once again a complete idiot who tries to say games are used in the military to break down the inhibition to kill, which is a complete BS claim made up by the hack psychologists and debunked by a person in the military, on this blog.
I posted in the article twice. The first time I basically said that Millions of people played Doom and Call of Duty, yet only 3 killed. Then someone posts this crap in return.... the person in question was posting a lot of BS trying to say video games make people violent.
"Doom is probably the most gory of any videogame produced at the time. Shooting people and watching blood spray out is a murder-fetishist's wet dream."
This idiot spews crap about doom which is not true, surprise! And then tries to say violent video games are a "murder-fetishists wet dream". Number 1, the only fucking people in Doom are zombie soldiers. I can think of Tons of games from "that time" (1999) that are WAY more violent than doom.
Postal - Innocent people killing simulator
Shadow Warrior - Gorey as hell
Blood - Same Thing
Quake 2 - Same Thing
Heretic - Really Gorey
Quake - Same Thing
Duke3d - Gorey as hell
Surprise! that makes Doom NOT the most violent game from that time. Even Wolf3D's gore is worse.
And the murder fetishist wet dream sounds like something #fullmcintosh would say. His Comments spew nonsense spread by the Hack Psychologists too. I don't know if he is likening Gamers to Murder Fetishists, but if he is, he is an idiot. Gamers =/= murder fetishists! Fuck that stupid stereotypical crap.
There are other stupid comments on the article now. One tries to say "WAAAAAAH! these games are too violent, they shouldn't be allowed!", and I bet there will be worse
My Other comment basically exposed the article for using multiple sites to spam it on the Internet for moral panic creation purposes. That comment got deleted. I posted the images I will show you below in the comment and it got deleted. Every day more sites and twitter accounts/bots post the article over and over again... It's getting tons of coverage and this may lead to a moral panic now...
Here are images proving that it's been recycled on different sites and spread by TONS of twitter accounts...
Now I don't know why the fuck these people on winbeta want to censor me just like the idiots hosting the site the posted the shitty articles after The UCC Shooting, They Censor any post that tries to expose their agenda. It's stupid. I personally think that GG should go after this article now. I really don't want to post on it again. It will only lead to more BS Responses now, something I know from experience. I tell the truth and these fucking liars like BSheets and Waethorn spread complete BS to "debunk" things I say which are true. And the further it goes, the more likely they will ingage in ad-hominem threats and such, so I think It's time these people get targeted by other idiots online who are at least Pro-Gaming.
But the author of this article I want to call out now.
Kip, you are a fucking idiot. You're article is filled with lies and BS. You spread it on MULTIPLE SITES and MULTIPLE Twitter Accounts and BOTS to SPREAD a MORAL PANIC to satisfy your WET DREAM of video game CENSORSHIP after a TERRORIST ATTACK that had NOTHING to do with games. The shooter even called 911 to say "I DID IT FOR ISIS!" in the middle of the shooting. You are STOMPING on the VICTIMS for your own AGENDA. You are a fucktard.
Sunday, June 19, 2016
Another BS Filled Article spreading Lies About Violent Games after Orlando (and implies censorship is good)
And I thought this BS train of crappy articles making up stupid claims was done...
Enter THIS Article:
This article is about E3 and tries to claim that people aren't allowed to Criticize violent entertainment.
That's BS because these fuckwads have tons of tons of sites they infest to do just that, and when one of them, or all of them, makes up nonsense claims they get criticized in return by people who KNOW WHAT THE FUCK THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT.
Case and Point, the stupid constant BS surrounding the equally stupid quote by Jonathan Blow.
"The Lesson of E3, the Gaming Industry is trying really hard to make being a mass murderer fun"
The Author of this article tries to claim that this quote got silenced by "armies of violent gamers" but ignores the stupidity of the comment itself. The Comment tries to equate mass murder with a video game where you kill people who try to kill you. The two are NOT the same asshole!
Mass murder involves killing dozens of Innocent, Defenseless people. NOT people who try to kill you! The two are not the same at all. One is Combat, One is Murder. Is Combat Murder? No. Murder involves intentionally taking a life of someone who is defenseless. The characters in the game are NOT defenseless. They shoot, or stab you if they get the chance to. It's stupid to make a claim that a game like this is mass murder. That is the stupidest thing ever. If there was a game where you went around a pre-school and killed dozens of innocent 3 year olds, and it was shown at E3, that comment by Blowhard would be valid. But since a game like that doesn't exist, his comment is stupid and he deserves "vitriolic" comments and worse and return.
And so is this writer for saying that Blow got "Vitriolic" responses, for merely Criticizing. Sorry. Blow did more than Criticize. He Made up BS. Complete BS that says a game is the same as mass murder. It's stupid. And so is the writer.
People like blow shouldn't be allowed to spread shit like this. Things like his lies lead to actual moral panics and moral panics lead to censorship. What do you think an average, Bible Thumping/Gamer Hating Extremist is going to do if they hear that comment. They will contact their Rep asking them to do something about video game violence. Then we get a bunch of fucking idiotic politicians trying to censor an art form. It's happened Before.
Columbine:
A bunch of assholes tried to post a fake Eric Harris AOL Site saying Doom was his primary influence using a fake quote that said "Doom Will Become Reality on April 21". Well... The media spread this nonsense and soon the government got involved and they tried to ban violent games to ADULTS in many states. It failed but they Tried.
Sandy Hook:
A Bunch of Media sites say Adam Lanza Played Call of Duty. The watchers of the media then called their Rep. Soon the Government forced the industry to meet with them to ask them what they (the industry) could do to stop killings. Soon there was a CDC Study on video games to see if there was a correlation between mass killings and them,
UCC Shooting:
Some Fucking Idiot posted a tweet saying the shooter was falsely "confirmed" to be Samuel Hyde, a youtube gamer and Comedian. Soon a HUGE Witch Mob started to attack violent games. This was long before we knew who the real shooter was. Some of these people contacted their rep's and soon the Senators involved attacked violent games again.
See what happens when idiots who spread lies are believed. Those believers contact people who can actually stifle an art form.
Which is worse? Fucking Censorship Enabling Assholes like Blow getting death threats or their fucking wet dream of all video games that offend them getting censored or altered because the government is forcing the games to not be "offensive"/"Sexist"/"Violent"/"anything these mamby pambies don't like".
You tell me.
Enter THIS Article:
This article is about E3 and tries to claim that people aren't allowed to Criticize violent entertainment.
That's BS because these fuckwads have tons of tons of sites they infest to do just that, and when one of them, or all of them, makes up nonsense claims they get criticized in return by people who KNOW WHAT THE FUCK THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT.
Case and Point, the stupid constant BS surrounding the equally stupid quote by Jonathan Blow.
"The Lesson of E3, the Gaming Industry is trying really hard to make being a mass murderer fun"
The Author of this article tries to claim that this quote got silenced by "armies of violent gamers" but ignores the stupidity of the comment itself. The Comment tries to equate mass murder with a video game where you kill people who try to kill you. The two are NOT the same asshole!
Mass murder involves killing dozens of Innocent, Defenseless people. NOT people who try to kill you! The two are not the same at all. One is Combat, One is Murder. Is Combat Murder? No. Murder involves intentionally taking a life of someone who is defenseless. The characters in the game are NOT defenseless. They shoot, or stab you if they get the chance to. It's stupid to make a claim that a game like this is mass murder. That is the stupidest thing ever. If there was a game where you went around a pre-school and killed dozens of innocent 3 year olds, and it was shown at E3, that comment by Blowhard would be valid. But since a game like that doesn't exist, his comment is stupid and he deserves "vitriolic" comments and worse and return.
And so is this writer for saying that Blow got "Vitriolic" responses, for merely Criticizing. Sorry. Blow did more than Criticize. He Made up BS. Complete BS that says a game is the same as mass murder. It's stupid. And so is the writer.
People like blow shouldn't be allowed to spread shit like this. Things like his lies lead to actual moral panics and moral panics lead to censorship. What do you think an average, Bible Thumping/Gamer Hating Extremist is going to do if they hear that comment. They will contact their Rep asking them to do something about video game violence. Then we get a bunch of fucking idiotic politicians trying to censor an art form. It's happened Before.
Columbine:
A bunch of assholes tried to post a fake Eric Harris AOL Site saying Doom was his primary influence using a fake quote that said "Doom Will Become Reality on April 21". Well... The media spread this nonsense and soon the government got involved and they tried to ban violent games to ADULTS in many states. It failed but they Tried.
Sandy Hook:
A Bunch of Media sites say Adam Lanza Played Call of Duty. The watchers of the media then called their Rep. Soon the Government forced the industry to meet with them to ask them what they (the industry) could do to stop killings. Soon there was a CDC Study on video games to see if there was a correlation between mass killings and them,
UCC Shooting:
Some Fucking Idiot posted a tweet saying the shooter was falsely "confirmed" to be Samuel Hyde, a youtube gamer and Comedian. Soon a HUGE Witch Mob started to attack violent games. This was long before we knew who the real shooter was. Some of these people contacted their rep's and soon the Senators involved attacked violent games again.
See what happens when idiots who spread lies are believed. Those believers contact people who can actually stifle an art form.
Which is worse? Fucking Censorship Enabling Assholes like Blow getting death threats or their fucking wet dream of all video games that offend them getting censored or altered because the government is forcing the games to not be "offensive"/"Sexist"/"Violent"/"anything these mamby pambies don't like".
You tell me.
Another fucking idiot Writer bashes violent video games after the Orlando Shooting
Well.. More Fucking Idiots are jumping on the "Shit on the Graves of the 50 dead in the orlando shooting to bash violent games" bandwagon. Case and point... This Article.
The writer of this article is a fucking moron, who blames violent games for previous shootings that had nothing to do with them, and erroneously says Call of Duty was played by the Columbine Shooters, when that's Impossible (Call of duty wasn't out in 1999 you fucking idiot! Do your fucking research!) And he prefaces it by saying he isn't blaming shootings on games but then implies it's the games fault by saying there is a "connection" between Call of Duty for Columbine and Sandy hook.
First of all you fucking idiot, Columbine was a BOTCHED TERRORIST Attack, done to kill as many a cops as possible to get revenge for a police rape in an arrest for bomb making materials. It had NOTHING to do with games. We don't even know the reason Adam Lanza shot up Sandy Hook, but I don't think It was video games. Video games simply don't have levels where you can get the idea to mass murder a school filled with toddlers and teachers. There are NO games featuring that idea so fuck off.
Idiots like this piss me off. One quote in particular REALLY pisses me off...
"Is on-screen violence pushing some already-troubled problem child over the brink so that gaming companies can make another billion and if so is that okay? Is it okay that gaming companies make their billions by enabling us to take out our aggressions and talk about our “kills” in school or at work the next day?"
No it's not. And it's not the video game's fault if a nutjob goes out and kills people after he plays a video game. He's fucking insane. Video games have nothing to do with things like this. And talking about kills in work is fine. Fuck off.
What really pisses me off is that he quotes Jonathan Blowhard....
“The lesson of E3: Game studios are working very hard to build fantasies about how cool it is to be a mass murderer.”
This is complete BS. There is a HUGE difference between mass murder and the average combat in a video game. None of the trailers show mass murder. Mass murder involves "innocent", "defenseless" people. Not characters in a video game that fight back. It might be not so obvious to idiots like Kip here but 99% of targets in video games fight back. That doesn't count as murder you idiot.
People like this piss me off. The stretch the truth to bash violent games, something they hate, after a killing that had nothing to do with them. The Orlando shooter called 911 and said "I did it for Isis". That's proof it had nothing to do with video games. Stop being an idiot.
What really pisses me off is that shoddy Journalism like this is being peddled by idiots like these:
Yes, a PC Repair place is now enabling bashing of violent games after a shooting. Fuck them.
EDIT : The Following Twits are Fucking Spreading a Moral Panic by spreading the same article under the hashtag #technology
Here are more Bots or posters posting the same article I found later on last night/tonight
There are also multiple clones of this article online, just like the last shitty article that followed the UCC Shooting.
http://www.gamerculture.com/lifestyle/can-we-talk-about-video-game-violence-winbeta/
http://www.allcom.se/it-nyheter/can-we-talk-about-video-game-violence/
http://www.techsupportforum.com/forums/f337/can-we-talk-about-video-game-violence-1140554.html
The writer of this article is a fucking moron, who blames violent games for previous shootings that had nothing to do with them, and erroneously says Call of Duty was played by the Columbine Shooters, when that's Impossible (Call of duty wasn't out in 1999 you fucking idiot! Do your fucking research!) And he prefaces it by saying he isn't blaming shootings on games but then implies it's the games fault by saying there is a "connection" between Call of Duty for Columbine and Sandy hook.
First of all you fucking idiot, Columbine was a BOTCHED TERRORIST Attack, done to kill as many a cops as possible to get revenge for a police rape in an arrest for bomb making materials. It had NOTHING to do with games. We don't even know the reason Adam Lanza shot up Sandy Hook, but I don't think It was video games. Video games simply don't have levels where you can get the idea to mass murder a school filled with toddlers and teachers. There are NO games featuring that idea so fuck off.
Idiots like this piss me off. One quote in particular REALLY pisses me off...
"Is on-screen violence pushing some already-troubled problem child over the brink so that gaming companies can make another billion and if so is that okay? Is it okay that gaming companies make their billions by enabling us to take out our aggressions and talk about our “kills” in school or at work the next day?"
No it's not. And it's not the video game's fault if a nutjob goes out and kills people after he plays a video game. He's fucking insane. Video games have nothing to do with things like this. And talking about kills in work is fine. Fuck off.
What really pisses me off is that he quotes Jonathan Blowhard....
“The lesson of E3: Game studios are working very hard to build fantasies about how cool it is to be a mass murderer.”
This is complete BS. There is a HUGE difference between mass murder and the average combat in a video game. None of the trailers show mass murder. Mass murder involves "innocent", "defenseless" people. Not characters in a video game that fight back. It might be not so obvious to idiots like Kip here but 99% of targets in video games fight back. That doesn't count as murder you idiot.
People like this piss me off. The stretch the truth to bash violent games, something they hate, after a killing that had nothing to do with them. The Orlando shooter called 911 and said "I did it for Isis". That's proof it had nothing to do with video games. Stop being an idiot.
What really pisses me off is that shoddy Journalism like this is being peddled by idiots like these:
Yes, a PC Repair place is now enabling bashing of violent games after a shooting. Fuck them.
EDIT : The Following Twits are Fucking Spreading a Moral Panic by spreading the same article under the hashtag #technology
Here are more Bots or posters posting the same article I found later on last night/tonight
There are also multiple clones of this article online, just like the last shitty article that followed the UCC Shooting.
http://www.gamerculture.com/lifestyle/can-we-talk-about-video-game-violence-winbeta/
http://www.allcom.se/it-nyheter/can-we-talk-about-video-game-violence/
http://www.techsupportforum.com/forums/f337/can-we-talk-about-video-game-violence-1140554.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)